↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanodrugs: pharmacokinetics and safety

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
287 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
Title
Nanodrugs: pharmacokinetics and safety
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s38378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satomi Onoue, Shizuo Yamada, Hak-Kim Chan

Abstract

To date, various nanodrug systems have been developed for different routes of administration, which include dendrimers, nanocrystals, emulsions, liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, micelles, and polymeric nanoparticles. Nanodrug systems have been employed to improve the efficacy, safety, physicochemical properties, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of pharmaceutical substances. In particular, functionalized nanodrug systems can offer enhanced bioavailability of orally taken drugs, prolonged half-life of injected drugs (by reducing immunogenicity), and targeted delivery to specific tissues. Thus, nanodrug systems might lower the frequency of administration while providing maximized pharmacological effects and minimized systemic side effects, possibly leading to better therapeutic compliance and clinical outcomes. In spite of these attractive pharmacokinetic advantages, recent attention has been drawn to the toxic potential of nanodrugs since they often exhibit in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, and genotoxicity. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and safety characteristics of nanodrugs and the limitations of each delivery option is necessary for the further development of efficacious nanodrugs with high therapeutic potential and a wide safety margin. This review highlights the recent progress in nanodrug system development, with a focus on the pharmacokinetic advantages and safety challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 405 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 20%
Student > Master 55 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Researcher 29 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 113 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 78 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 9%
Chemistry 39 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 7%
Other 57 14%
Unknown 125 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,557,965
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#670
of 4,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,804
of 323,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#16
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.