↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of gefitinib as first- and second-line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with positive exon 21 or 19 del epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of gefitinib as first- and second-line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with positive exon 21 or 19 del epidermal growth factor receptor mutation
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, June 2017
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s138643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nishant Patel, Pingping Wu, Haijun Zhang

Abstract

Gefitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), shows excellent clinical benefit in treating advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of gefitinib as first-line therapy and second-line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with positive exon 21 (L858R) or exon 19 deletion of EGFR mutation. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 60 EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients from July 2011 to November 2015 who have received oral gefitinib 250 mg once daily. Gefitinib was taken until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or death. After a median follow-up of 792 days, one death had occurred. Among the 59 patients who survived, 17 patients progressed. Overall, the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.53-12.46 months, p<0.05). The response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 33.33% and 71.66%, respectively. However, there was longer mPFS in the first line-therapy than that in the second-line therapy: in the first-line gefitinib therapy, mPFS was 12 months among 41 patients (95% CI: 9.58-14.41 months, p<0.05), and in the second-line therapy, mPFS was 7 months among 19 patients (95% CI: 1.31-12.68 months, p<0.05). Furthermore, in subgroup analyses examining different EGFR mutation types, we noted that mPFS was significantly longer for patients with exon 19 deletion than for those with positive exon 21in both the first-line therapy and second-line therapy. Patients with advance lung adenocarcinoma who were selected by positive exon 21 or 19 deletion mutations had significantly longer mPFS in the first-line therapy than that in the second-line therapy when treated with gefitinib. EGFR mutation types may influence the response to gefitinib therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Master 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,431,953
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,402
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,584
of 316,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.