↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Long-term safety and efficacy of budesonide in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Long-term safety and efficacy of budesonide in the treatment of ulcerative colitis
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s34715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marisa Iborra, Diego Álvarez-Sotomayor, Pilar Nos

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, relapsing, and remitting inflammatory disease involving the large intestine (colon). Treatment seeks to break recurrent inflammation episodes by inducing and maintaining remission. Historically, oral systemic corticosteroids played an important role in inducing remission of this chronic disease; however, their long-term use is limited and can lead to adverse events. Budesonide is a synthetic steroid with potent local anti-inflammatory effects and low systemic bioavailability due to high first-pass hepatic metabolism. Several studies have demonstrated oral budesonide's usefulness in treating active mild to moderate ileocecal Crohn's disease and microscopic colitis and in an enema formulation for left sided UC. However, there is limited information regarding oral budesonide's efficacy in UC. A novel oral budesonide formulation using a multimatrix system (budesonide-MMX) to extend drug release throughout the colon has been developed recently and seems to be an effective treatment in active left sided UC patients. This article summarizes budesonide's long-term safety and efficacy in treating UC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 17 27%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 13%
Unspecified 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,427,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#132
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,762
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.