↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Current evidence for the use of C-MAC videolaryngoscope in adult airway management: a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Current evidence for the use of C-MAC videolaryngoscope in adult airway management: a review of the literature
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s136221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fu-Shan Xue, Hui-Xian Li, Ya-Yang Liu, Gui-Zhen Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 15%
Researcher 11 12%
Other 7 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 34 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#810
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,541
of 326,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#15
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.