| Title |
Level of agreement between self-rated and clinician-rated instruments when measuring major depressive disorder in the Thai elderly: a 1-year assessment as part of the THAISAD study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s56683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Kamonporn Wannarit, Nattha Saisavoey, Manee Pinyopornpanish, Peeraphon Lueboonthavatchai, Nattaporn Apisiridej, Thawanrat Srichan, Ruk Ruktrakul, Sirina Satthapisit, Daochompu Nakawiro, Thanita Hiranyatheb, Anakevich Temboonkiat, Namtip Tubtimtong, Sukanya Rakkhajeekul, Boonsanong Wongtanoi, Sitthinant Tanchakvaranont, Putipong Bookkamana, Usaree Srisutasanavong, Raviwan Nivataphand, Donruedee Petchsuwan |
| Abstract |
Whether self-reporting and clinician-rated depression scales correlate well with one another when applied to older adults has not been well studied, particularly among Asian samples. This study aimed to compare the level of agreement among measurements used in assessing major depressive disorder (MDD) among the Thai elderly and the factors associated with the differences found. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 27% |
| Psychology | 5 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,010
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,629
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#18
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.