↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Process of spontaneous resolution in the conservative management of congenital dacryocystocele

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Process of spontaneous resolution in the conservative management of congenital dacryocystocele
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s58342
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masashi Mimura, Mari Ueki, Hidehiro Oku, Bunpei Sato, Tsunehiko Ikeda

Abstract

To assess efficacy of the conservative management of patients with congenital dacryocystocele.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,605
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,612
of 322,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#30
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.