| Title |
Tiotropium in asthma: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jaa.s38841 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Befekadu, Claudia Onofrei, Gene L Colice |
| Abstract |
The objective of this paper is to systematically review the existing evidence of the effectiveness and safety profile of a long-acting inhaled muscarinic antagonist as add-on therapy in patients with asthma that is uncontrolled despite inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Romania | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 56% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,403,526
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#59
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,132
of 323,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them