| Title |
Development of the Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ) to identify airflow obstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s7683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara P Yawn, Douglas W Mapel, David M Mannino, Fernando J Martinez, James F Donohue, Nicola A Hanania, Mark Kosinski, Regina Rendas-Baum, Matthew Mintz, Steven Samuels, Anand A Dalal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Malawi | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 26% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 45% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,882,642
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#148
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,053
of 176,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them