↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Active smoking and COPD phenotype: distribution and impact on prognostic factors

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Active smoking and COPD phenotype: distribution and impact on prognostic factors
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/copd.s135344
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Antonio Riesco, Bernardino Alcázar, Juan Antonio Trigueros, Anna Campuzano, Joselín Pérez, José Luis Lorenzo

Abstract

Smoking can affect both the phenotypic expression of COPD and factors such as disease severity, quality of life, and comorbidities. Our objective was to evaluate if the impact of active smoking on these factors varies according to the disease phenotype. This was a Spanish, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of patients with a diagnosis of COPD. Smoking rates were described among four different phenotypes (non-exacerbators, asthma-COPD overlap syndrome [ACOS], exacerbators with emphysema, and exacerbators with chronic bronchitis), and correlated with disease severity (body mass index, obstruction, dyspnea and exacerbations [BODEx] index and dyspnea grade), quality of life according to the COPD assessment test (CAT), and presence of comorbidities, according to phenotypic expression. In total, 1,610 patients were recruited, of whom 46.70% were classified as non-exacerbators, 14.53% as ACOS, 16.37% as exacerbators with emphysema, and 22.40% as exacerbators with chronic bronchitis. Smokers were predominant in the latter 2 groups (58.91% and 57.67%, respectively, P=0.03). Active smoking was significantly associated with better quality of life and a higher dyspnea grade, although differences were observed depending on clinical phenotype. Active smoking is more common among exacerbator phenotypes and appears to affect quality of life and dyspnea grade differently, depending on the clinical expression of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 26 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 30 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,136,656
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#499
of 2,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,678
of 327,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#18
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.