| Title |
Management of tennis elbow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oajsm.s10310 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda S Chesterton, Christian D Mallen, Elaine M Hay |
| Abstract |
What is the best treatment for tennis elbow? |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,931,648
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#70
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,249
of 111,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.