↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Vascular Diagnostics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: current perspectives
Published in
Journal of Vascular Diagnostics, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/jvd.s47384
Authors

Marian Simka

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 75%
Researcher 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Mathematics 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#395,250
of 6,230,693 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular Diagnostics
#1
of 8 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,072
of 131,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular Diagnostics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,230,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them