↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Recurrent furunculosis – challenges and management: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Recurrent furunculosis – challenges and management: a review
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s35302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina Sophie Ibler, Charles B Kromann

Abstract

Furunculosis is a deep infection of the hair follicle leading to abscess formation with accumulation of pus and necrotic tissue. Furuncles appear as red, swollen, and tender nodules on hair-bearing parts of the body, and the most common infectious agent is Staphylococcus aureus, but other bacteria may also be causative. In some countries, methicillin resistant S. aureus is the most common pathogen in skin and soft tissue infections which is problematic since treatment is difficult. Furunculosis often tends to be recurrent and may spread among family members. Some patients are carriers of S. aureus and eradication should be considered in recurrent cases. Solitary lesions should be incised when fluctuant, whereas patients with multiple lesions or signs of systemic disease or immunosuppression should be treated with relevant antibiotics. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to a patient suspected of staphylococcosis should include a thorough medical history, clinical examination, and specific microbiological and biochemical investigations. This is particularly important in recurrent cases where culture swabs from the patient, family members, and close contacts are mandatory to identify and ultimately control the chain of infection. Focus on personal, interpersonal, and environmental hygiene issues is crucial to reduce the risk of contamination and recurrences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 23%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 5 3%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 47 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,082,791
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#95
of 900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,764
of 323,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.