Title |
A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/opth.s124580 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hung-Yuan Lin, Yi-Ting Fang, Ya-Jung Chuang, Justin N Karlin, Hsin-Yang Chen, Szu-Yuan Lin, Pi-Jung Lin, Ming Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 21% |
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 50% |
Engineering | 3 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,537,041
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#261
of 3,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,689
of 425,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,722 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.