↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels are associated with histologic subtype, EGFR mutations, and ALK fusion in patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels are associated with histologic subtype, EGFR mutations, and ALK fusion in patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s134452
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zeng Wang, Shifeng Yang, Hongyang Lu

Abstract

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is often elevated in lung adenocarcinoma, but not in all patients. Meanwhile, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion protein are the main driving forces in lung adenocarcinoma. However, whether CEA levels are associated with histologic subtype, EGFR mutations, and ALK fusion remain largely unclear. Preoperative serum CEA levels, postoperative histologic subtypes, and statuses of EGFR mutations and ALK fusion protein were retrospectively assessed in 442 patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinoma treated from January 2014 to December 2015 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, People's Republic of China. EGFR mutations were found in 69.9% (309/442) of lung adenocarcinoma patients, and ALK fusion protein in 4.5% (20/442). EGFR mutations occurred more frequently in the lepidic subtype (P=0.001). High preoperative serum CEA levels (CEA >20 ng/mL) were independently associated with EGFR mutations (P<0.001). Moreover, in patients with CEA levels of 21-49 ng/mL, the EGFR mutation rate was 88.2%, which was higher compared to those obtained in the other subgroups. In addition, all specimens were invasive adenocarcinoma, with lepidic (18.6%), papillary (15.4%), acinar (52.7%), solid (9.7%), micropapillary (3.2%), and mucinous predominant (0.4%) subtypes; CEA levels in patients with the solid subtype were higher than those of other histologic subtypes (P=0.001). Preoperative serum CEA levels can serve as a reference marker to identify the histologic subtype, and EGFR mutation or ALK fusion protein status, in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Moreover, histological subtypes could also predict EGFR mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,357,897
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#377
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,335
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#8
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.