| Title |
Resistant mutations in CML and Ph+ALL – role of ponatinib
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/btt.s50734 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Lim, Geoffrey D. Miller, Benjamin J. Bruno |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,969,163
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#26
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,729
of 254,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.