↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Efficacy and safety of iron isomaltoside (Monofer®) in the management of patients with iron deficiency anemia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of iron isomaltoside (Monofer®) in the management of patients with iron deficiency anemia
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s89704
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip A Kalra, Sunil Bhandari

Abstract

New intravenous (IV) iron preparations should ideally be capable of delivering a wide dosing range to allow iron correction in a single or low number of visits, a rapid infusion (doses up to 1,000 mg must be administered over more than 15 minutes and doses exceeding 1,000 mg must be administered over 30 minutes or more), and minimal potential side effects including low catalytic/labile iron release with minimal risk of anaphylaxis. Furthermore, they should be convenient for the patient and health-care professional, and cost effective for the health-care system. The intention behind the development of iron isomaltoside (Monofer(®)) was to fulfill these requirements. Iron isomaltoside has been shown to be effective in treating iron deficiency anemia across multiple therapeutic patient groups and compared to placebo, IV iron sucrose, and oral iron. Iron isomaltoside consists of iron and a carbohydrate moiety where the iron is tightly bound in a matrix structure. It has a low immunogenic potential, a low potential to release labile iron, and does not appear to be associated with clinically significant hypophosphatemia. Due to the structure of iron isomaltoside, it can be administered in high doses with a maximum single dosage of 20 mg/kg body weight. Clinical trials and observational studies of iron isomaltoside show that it is an effective and well-tolerated treatment of anemia across different therapeutic areas with a favorable safety profile.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,944,189
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#209
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,955
of 300,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.