↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The relationship between depression, anxiety, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
The relationship between depression, anxiety, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, May 2010
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s6880
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff C Huffman, Christopher M Celano, James L Januzzi

Abstract

Depression and anxiety occur at high rates among patients suffering an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Both depressive symptoms and anxiety appear to adversely affect in-hospital and long term cardiac outcomes of post-ACS patients, independent of traditional risk factors. Despite their high prevalence and serious impact, mood and anxiety symptoms go unrecognized and untreated in most ACS patients and such symptoms (rather than being transient reactions to ACS) persist for months and beyond. The mechanisms by which depression and anxiety are linked to these negative medical outcomes are likely a combination of the effects of these conditions on inflammation, catecholamines, heart rate variability, and endothelial function, along with effects on health-promoting behavior. Fortunately, standard treatments for these disorders appear to be safe, well-tolerated and efficacious in this population; indeed, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may actually improve cardiac outcomes. Future research goals include gaining a better understanding of the combined effects of depression and anxiety, as well as definitive prospective studies of the impact of treatment on cardiac outcomes. Clinically, protocols that allow for efficient and systematic screening, evaluation, and treatment for depression and anxiety in cardiac patients are critical to help patients avoid the devastating effects of these illnesses on quality of life and cardiac health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 15%
Lecturer 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 68 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 49 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 21%
Psychology 26 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 74 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,138,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#265
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,598
of 104,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.