↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Health economic analyses in medical nutrition: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Health economic analyses in medical nutrition: a systematic literature review
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s53601
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Walzer, Daniel Droeschel, Mark Nuijten, Hélène Chevrou-Séverac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,781,609
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#313
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,601
of 236,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.