| Title |
Education and technology used to improve the quality of life for people with diabetes mellitus type II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s52681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brooke Dudley, Brianne Heiland, Elizabeth Kohler-Rausch, Mark Kovic |
| Abstract |
The incidence of type II diabetes mellitus (DMT2) is expected to continue to rise. Current research has analyzed various tools, strategies, programs, barriers, and support in regards to the self-management of this condition. However, past researchers have yet to analyze the education process; including the adaptation of specific strategies in activities of daily living and roles, as well as the influence of health care providers in the integration of these strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 31% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#732
of 991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,869
of 236,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.