↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparative cost effectiveness of Coflex® interlaminar stabilization versus instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Comparative cost effectiveness of Coflex® interlaminar stabilization versus instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s59194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordana Kate Schmier, Marci Halevi, Greg Maislin, Kevin Ong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 17%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,236,539
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#66
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,441
of 236,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.