| Title |
Efficacy and safety of Curcuma domestica extracts compared with ibuprofen in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s58535 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vilai Kuptniratsaikul, Piyapat Dajpratham, Wirat Taechaarpornkul, Montana Buntragulpoontawee, Pranee Lukkanapichonchut, Chirawan Chootip, Jittima Saengsuwan, Kesthamrong Tantayakom, Supphalak Laongpech |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 13% |
| United States | 8 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Syrian Arab Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 492 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 485 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 99 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 14% |
| Researcher | 35 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 87 | 18% |
| Unknown | 138 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 36 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 15% |
| Unknown | 153 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#181,769
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#17
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,442
of 237,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.