The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Patient perceptions of electronic medical records use and ratings of care quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient related outcome measures, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/prom.s58967 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lila J Finney Rutten, Sana N Vieux, Jennifer L St Sauver, Neeraj K Arora, Richard P Moser, Ellen Burke Beckjord, Bradford W Hesse |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,176,192
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#11
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,937
of 237,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them