↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Magnetic resonance imaging for assessing hamstring injuries: clinical benefits and pitfalls – a review of the current literature

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging for assessing hamstring injuries: clinical benefits and pitfalls – a review of the current literature
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s113007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Greenky, Steven B Cohen

Abstract

Hamstring injuries are common injuries in all levels of athletics. Hamstring injuries can cause prolonged absence from sports and have a notorious rate of reinjury. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being increasingly utilized following a hamstring injury. Physicians are being increasingly asked to utilize MRI to predict clinical outcomes, including time frame for return to play and risk of reinjury. In spite of numerous studies in this area, no clear consensus exists. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the literature and evidence regarding the role of MRI in treating hamstring injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Sports and Recreations 6 11%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,752,622
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#130
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,606
of 314,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.