↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of dimethyl fumarate (BG-12) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of dimethyl fumarate (BG-12) for treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s53285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serena Ruggieri, Carla Tortorella, Claudio Gasperini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 82 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2014.
All research outputs
#16,101,186
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#752
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,612
of 236,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.