↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Characteristics and predictors of progression in an Egyptian multiple sclerosis cohort: a multicenter registry study

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Characteristics and predictors of progression in an Egyptian multiple sclerosis cohort: a multicenter registry study
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s140869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherif M Hamdy, Maged Abdel-Naseer, Nevin M Shalaby, Alaa N Elmazny, Ahmed A Nemr, Amr Hassan, Mohamed I Hegazy, Husam S Mourad, Nirmeen A Kishk, Mona A Nada, Ahmed Abdelalim, Amr M Fouad, Hatem S Shehata

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex autoimmune disease with a heterogeneous presentation and diverse disease course. Recent studies indicate a rising prevalence of MS in the Middle East. To characterize the demographics and disease features of Egyptian patients attending four tertiary referral MS centers in Cairo. This was a retrospective, observational study on 1,581 patients between 2001 and 2015. Medical records were reviewed and data were identified and extracted in a standardized electronic registry. The mean age of disease onset was 26.6±7.8 years, with the majority being female (2.11:1). Relapsing-remitting MS was the most common type (75.1%). The main presenting symptom was motor weakness (43.9%), which was also the most frequent symptom during the disease course. Family history of MS was found in 2.28%. Higher initial Expanded Disability Status Scale score, black holes, and infratentorial lesions on initial magnetic resonance imaging were independent factors for disease progression by univariate analysis (OR 3.87 [95% CI 1.84-6.51], 4.14 [95% CI 3.08-5.58], 4.07 [95% CI 3.21-4.99], respectively); however, in multivariate analysis, only infratentorial lesions were an independent risk for disease progression (OR 6, 95% CI 2.99-12.02; P=0.0005). The results from this registry - the largest for MS in the Arab region to date - are comparable to other registries with slight differences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 25%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,192
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,315
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#55
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.