↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bisdemethoxycurcumin in combination with α-PD-L1 antibody boosts immune response against bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Bisdemethoxycurcumin in combination with α-PD-L1 antibody boosts immune response against bladder cancer
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/ott.s130653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiqun Shao, Wenjing Zhu, Jun Da, Mingxi Xu, Yiwei Wang, Juan Zhou, Zhong Wang

Abstract

Curcumin was recently discovered to strengthen immune response through multiple mechanisms. Cytotoxic CD8(+) T-cells play a critical role in modulating anticancer immune response, but is severely restricted by T-cell exhaustion. Bladder carcinomas express PD-L1 and can abrogate CD8(+) T-cell response. Thus, we hypothesized that bisdemethoxycurcumin, a natural dimethoxy derivative of curcumin, may provide a favorable environment for T-cell response against bladder cancer when used in combination with α-PD-L1 antibody. Immunocompetent C56BL/6 mouse models bearing subcutaneous or lung metastasized MB79 bladder cancer were established to validate this conjecture. We found that bisdemethoxycurcumin significantly increased intratumoral CD8(+) T-cell infiltration, elevated the level of IFN-γ in the blood, and decreased the number of intratumoral myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Furthermore, α-PD-L1 antibody protected these amplified CD8(+) T-cells from exhaustion, and therefore facilitated the secretion of IFN-γ, granzyme B, and perforin through these CD8(+) T-cells. As a result, this combination treatment strategy significantly prolonged survival of intraperitoneal metastasized bladder cancer bearing mice, suggesting that bisdemethoxycurcumin in combination with α-PD-L1 antibody may be promising for bladder cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,447
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,646
of 324,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#42
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.