↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cost of illness of urothelial bladder cancer in Italy

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Cost of illness of urothelial bladder cancer in Italy
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s135065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Gerace, Francesco Montorsi, Rosa Tambaro, Giacomo Cartenì, Stefano De Luca, Marcello Tucci, Giuseppe Martorana, Umberto Basso, Leonardo Cardosi, Cristina Teruzzi

Abstract

Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) is the ninth most common cancer worldwide. In Italy, the prevalence of the disease is approximately 10%, making it the fourth most prevalent cancer in the country. The increase in prevalence requires continuous surveillance and care, resulting in a significant burden on Italian National Health Service, making any improvement to the strategy for diagnosing and treating this disease important to the medical and scientific community. The aim of this study was to evaluate the UBC cost of illness in the Italian context, collecting the total costs of the disease. An economic analysis was carried out in the context of the National Health Service, using data collected from six centers, in order to evaluate direct costs in terms of outpatient, inpatient, and emergency care; pharmaceuticals and follow-up procedures; and indirect costs in terms of productivity losses. Data were collected through aggregated form reports, focusing on patients with an existing diagnosis of UBC who were treated in the last year. The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) guidelines were used to identify diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Statistical analysis was conducted to explore variations among centers. The weighted mean total annual cost per patient was € 3,591, where the cost for superficial disease was € 3,252 and that for metastatic disease was € 606. The analysis confirmed a proportional relation between disease severity and disability grade. The UBC cost of illness, considering prevalence and incidence data coming from the 2016 AIOM/Italian Association of Cancer Registries report, was € 1,187,036,344. Indirect costs accounted to 44%, represented by estimated productivity losses. Our analysis represents the first economic study of UBC in the Italian context, as well as the first real-life evidence of the current therapeutic algorithm. This study opens the possibility for further analysis on the indirect cost components that represent a great burden for the society, especially for those in the severest stages of the disease with high disability grades.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#331
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,354
of 327,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.