↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Diagnosis and management of neurotrophic keratitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis and management of neurotrophic keratitis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s45921
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Sacchetti, Alessandro Lambiase

Abstract

Neurotrophic keratitis (NK) is a degenerative disease characterized by corneal sensitivity reduction, spontaneous epithelium breakdown, and impairment of corneal healing. Several causes of NK, including herpetic keratitis, diabetes, and ophthalmic and neurosurgical procedures, share the common mechanism of trigeminal damage. Diagnosis of NK requires accurate investigation of clinical ocular and systemic history, complete eye examination, and assessment of corneal sensitivity. All diagnostic procedures to achieve correct diagnosis and classification of NK, including additional examinations such as in vivo confocal microscopy, are reviewed. NK can be classified according to severity of corneal damage, ie, epithelial alterations (stage 1), persistent epithelial defect (stage 2), and corneal ulcer (stage 3). Management of NK should be based on clinical severity, and aimed at promoting corneal healing and preventing progression of the disease to stromal melting and perforation. Concomitant ocular diseases, such as exposure keratitis, dry eye, and limbal stem cell deficiency, negatively influence the outcome of NK and should be treated. Currently, no specific medical treatment exists, and surgical approaches, such as amniotic membrane transplantation and conjunctival flap, are effective in preserving eye integrity, without ameliorating corneal sensitivity or visual function. This review describes experimental and clinical reports showing several novel and potential therapies for NK, including growth factors and metalloprotease inhibitors, as well as three ongoing Phase II clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 250 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 16%
Other 33 13%
Student > Postgraduate 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Master 18 7%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 68 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 80 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,063,065
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#68
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,383
of 236,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.