↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, May 2009
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s4350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula H Bednarek, Jeffrey T Jensen

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) provide highly effective, long-term, safe, reversible contraception, and are the most widely used reversible contraceptive method worldwide. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is a T-shaped IUD with a steroid reservoir containing 52 mg of levonorgestrel that is released at an initial rate of 20 μg daily. It is highly effective, with a typical-use first year pregnancy rate of 0.1% - similar to surgical tubal occlusion. It is approved for 5 years of contraceptive use, and there is evidence that it can be effective for up to 7 years of continuous use. After removal, there is rapid return to fertility, with 1-year life-table pregnancy rates of 89 per 100 for women less than 30 years of age. Most users experience a dramatic reduction in menstrual bleeding, and about 15% to 20% of women become amenorrheic 1 year after insertion. The device's strong local effects on the endometrium benefit women with various benign gynecological conditions such as menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, leiomyomata, adenomyosis, and endometriosis. There is also evidence to support its role in endometrial protection during postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy, and in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#867,671
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#60
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,009
of 99,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them