↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pain-related mood influences pain perception differently in fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Pain-related mood influences pain perception differently in fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, January 2014
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s49236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Céline Borg, Catherine Padovan, Catherine Thomas-Antérion, Céline Chanial, Anaïs Sanchez, Marion Godot, Roland Peyron, Odile De Parisot, Bernard Laurent

Abstract

In patients, the perception of pain intensity may be influenced by the subjective representation of their disease. Although both multiple sclerosis (MS) and fibromyalgia (FM) possibly include chronic pain, they seem to elicit different disease representations because of the difference in their respective etiology, the former presenting evidence of underlying lesions as opposed to the latter. Thus, we investigated whether patients with FM differed from patients with MS with respect to their perception of "own" pain as well as others' pain. In addition, the psychological concomitant factors associated with chronic pain were considered. Chronic pain patients with FM (n=13) or with MS (n=13) participated in this study. To assess specific pain-related features, they were contrasted with 12 other patients with MS but without chronic pain and 31 controls. A questionnaire describing imaginary painful situations showed that FM patients rated situations applied to themselves as less painful than did the controls. Additionally, pain intensity attributed to facial expressions was estimated as more intense in FM compared with the other groups of participants. There is good evidence that the mood and catastrophizing reactions expressed in FM differentially modulated the perception of pain according to whether it was their own pain or other's pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,575
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,184
of 319,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.