↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Exploring targets and therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current insights into dietary interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Exploring targets and therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current insights into dietary interventions
Published in
Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/dnnd.s120607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shyuan T Ngo, Jia D Mi, Robert D Henderson, Pamela A McCombe, Frederik J Steyn

Abstract

A growing number of preclinical and human studies demonstrate a disease-modifying effect of nutritional state in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The management of optimal nutrition in ALS is complicated, as physiological, physical, and psychological effects of the disease need to be considered and addressed accordingly. In this regard, multidisciplinary care teams play an integral role in providing dietary guidance to ALS patients and their carers. However, with an increasing research focus on the use of dietary intervention strategies to manage disease symptoms and improve prognosis in ALS, many ALS patients are now seeking or are actively engaged in using complementary and alternative therapies that are dietary in nature. In this article, we review the aspects of appetite control, energy balance, and the physiological effects of ALS relative to their impact on overall nutrition. We then provide current insights into dietary interventions for ALS, considering the mechanisms of action of some of the common dietary interventions used in ALS, discussing their validity in the context of clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Neuroscience 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,523,437
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#6
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,293
of 327,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.