↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Raising HDL cholesterol in women

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Raising HDL cholesterol in women
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, November 2009
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s5110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danny J Eapen, Girish L Kalra, Luay Rifai, Christina A Eapen, Nadya Merchant, Bobby V Khan

Abstract

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration is essential in the determination of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in women. This is especially true in the postmenopausal state, where lipid profiles and CHD risk mimic that of age-matched men. Thus, interventions designed to reduce CHD risk by raising HDL-C levels may have particular significance during the transition to menopause. This review discusses HDL-C-raising therapies and the role of HDL in the primary prevention of CHD in women. Lifestyle-based interventions such as dietary change, aerobic exercise regimens, and smoking cessation are initial steps that are effective in raising HDL-C, and available data suggest women respond similarly to men with these interventions. When combined with pharmacotherapy, the effects of these lifestyle alterations are further amplified. Though studies demonstrating gender-specific differences in therapy are limited, niacin continues to be the most effective agent in raising HDL-C levels, especially when used in combination with fibrate or statin therapy. Emerging treatments such as HDL mimetic therapy show much promise in further raising HDL-C levels and improving cardiovascular outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Other 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 14 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,491
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#491
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,694
of 94,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them