↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Diagnosing urinary tract abnormalities: intravenous urography or CT urography?

Overview of attention for article published in Reports in Medical Imaging, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosing urinary tract abnormalities: intravenous urography or CT urography?
Published in
Reports in Medical Imaging, April 2014
DOI 10.2147/rmi.s35592
Authors

Mohamed Abou-El-Ghar, Huda Refaie, Doaa Sharaf, Tarek El-Diasty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 20 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Unspecified 2 5%
Materials Science 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,438,425
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Reports in Medical Imaging
#25
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,408
of 239,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reports in Medical Imaging
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.