↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Miniaturized high-resolution wide-field contact lens for panretinal photocoagulation

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Miniaturized high-resolution wide-field contact lens for panretinal photocoagulation
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s62177
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kakarla Chalam, Keyvan Koushan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#3,179,153
of 4,504,869 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#650
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,873
of 107,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#74
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,504,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.