↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Azacitidine and decitabine have different mechanisms of action in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 128)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Azacitidine and decitabine have different mechanisms of action in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines
Published in
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, September 2010
DOI 10.2147/lctt.s11726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron N Nguyen, Paul W Hollenbach, Normand Richard, Antonio Luna-Moran, Helen Brady, Carla Heise, Kyle J MacBeth

Abstract

Azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC) are cytidine azanucleoside analogs with clinical activity in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and potential activity in solid tumors. To better understand the mechanism of action of these drugs, we examined the effects of AZA and DAC in a panel of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. Of 5 NSCLC lines tested in a cell viability assay, all were sensitive to AZA (EC50 of 1.8-10.5 µM), while only H1299 cells were equally sensitive to DAC (EC50 of 5.1 µM). In the relatively DAC-insensitive cell line A549, both AZA and DAC caused DNA methyltransferase I depletion and DNA hypomethylation; however, only AZA significantly induced markers of DNA damage and apoptosis, suggesting that mechanisms in addition to, or other than, DNA hypomethylation are important for AZA-induced cell death. Cell cycle analysis indicated that AZA induced an accumulation of cells in sub-G1 phase, whereas DAC mainly caused an increase of cells in G2/M. Gene expression analysis of AZA- and DAC-treated cells revealed strikingly different profiles, with many genes distinctly regulated by each drug. In summary, while both AZA and DAC caused DNA hypomethylation, distinct effects were demonstrated on regulation of gene expression, cell cycle, DNA damage, and apoptosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#24
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,746
of 103,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them