| Title |
Self-assembling peptide-based nanoparticles enhance anticancer effect of ellipticine in vitro and in vivo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s31858 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Wu, Parisa Sadatmousavi, Rong Wang, Sheng Lu, Yong-fang Yuan, P. Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,379
of 179,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#30
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.