↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology

Overview of attention for article published in Nanotechnology Science and Applications, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
patent
18 patents

Readers on

mendeley
1076 Mendeley
Title
Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology
Published in
Nanotechnology Science and Applications, September 2008
DOI 10.2147/nsa.s3788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weibo Cai

Abstract

It has been almost 4 decades since the "war on cancer" was declared. It is now generally believed that personalized medicine is the future for cancer patient management. Possessing unprecedented potential for early detection, accurate diagnosis, and personalized treatment of cancer, nanoparticles have been extensively studied over the last decade. In this review, we will summarize the current state-of-the-art of gold nanoparticles in biomedical applications targeting cancer. Gold nanospheres, nanorods, nanoshells, nanocages, and surface enhanced Raman scattering nanoparticles will be discussed in detail regarding their uses in in vitro assays, ex vivo and in vivo imaging, cancer therapy, and drug delivery. Multifunctionality is the key feature of nanoparticle-based agents. Targeting ligands, imaging labels, therapeutic drugs, and other functionalities can all be integrated to allow for targeted molecular imaging and molecular therapy of cancer. Big strides have been made and many proof-of-principle studies have been successfully performed. The future looks brighter than ever yet many hurdles remain to be conquered. A multifunctional platform based on gold nanoparticles, with multiple receptor targeting, multimodality imaging, and multiple therapeutic entities, holds the promise for a "magic gold bullet" against cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,076 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 9 <1%
United States 6 <1%
Portugal 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Egypt 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 15 1%
Unknown 1023 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 287 27%
Student > Master 171 16%
Researcher 136 13%
Student > Bachelor 121 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 5%
Other 147 14%
Unknown 161 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 206 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 179 17%
Physics and Astronomy 94 9%
Engineering 91 8%
Materials Science 74 7%
Other 241 22%
Unknown 191 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,441,845
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnology Science and Applications
#2
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,353
of 96,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnology Science and Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them