| Title |
From Catastrophizing to Recovery: a pilot study of a single-session treatment for pain catastrophizing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s62329 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Beth D Darnall, John A Sturgeon, Ming-Chih Kao, Jennifer M Hah, Sean C Mackey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 36% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#739,976
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#102
of 1,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,960
of 231,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.