Title |
A longitudinal cohort study of the impact of first- and both-eye cataract surgery on falls and other injuries in Vietnam
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s61224 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kien Gia To, Lynn Meuleners, Max Bulsara, Michelle L Fraser, Dat Van Duong, Dung Van Do, Van-Anh Ngoc Huynh, Tien Duy Phi, Hoang Huy Tran, Nguyen Do Nguyen |
Abstract |
Little information exists on the impact of cataract surgery on falls and other injuries in Vietnam. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of first and both eye cataract surgery on the number of falls and other injuries among bilateral cataract patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 25% |
New Zealand | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#818
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,777
of 239,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#10
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.