↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A longitudinal cohort study of the impact of first- and both-eye cataract surgery on falls and other injuries in Vietnam.

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A longitudinal cohort study of the impact of first- and both-eye cataract surgery on falls and other injuries in Vietnam.
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2014
DOI 10.2147/cia.s61224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Fraser, Lynn Meuleners, Max Bulsara, Dat Van Duong, Dung Van Do, Van-Anh Ngoc Huynh, Tien Duy Phi, Hoang Huy Tran, Nguyen Do Nguyen, Kien Gia To, To KG, Meuleners L, Bulsara M, Fraser ML, Duong DV, Do DV, Huynh VA, Phi TD, Tran HH, Nguyen ND

Abstract

Little information exists on the impact of cataract surgery on falls and other injuries in Vietnam. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of first and both eye cataract surgery on the number of falls and other injuries among bilateral cataract patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Vietnam 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#3,037,460
of 7,352,188 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#375
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,837
of 173,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#15
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,352,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.