Title |
Methods for diagnosing perceived age on the basis of an ensemble of phenotypic features
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/ccid.s52257 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mireia Coma, Raquel Valls, José Manuel Mas, Albert Pujol, Miquel Angel Herranz, Vicente Alonso, Jordi Naval |
Abstract |
Perceived age has been defined as the age that a person is visually estimated to be on the basis of physical appearance. In a society where a youthful appearance are an object of desire for consumers, and a source of commercial profit for cosmetic companies, this concept has a prominent role. In addition, perceived age is also an indicator of overall health status in elderly people, since old-looking people tend to show higher rates of morbidity and mortality. However, there is a lack of objective methods for quantifying perceived age. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 34% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 17% |
Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#558
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,646
of 239,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.