↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Transdermal buprenorphine – a critical appraisal of its role in pain management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Transdermal buprenorphine – a critical appraisal of its role in pain management
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, September 2009
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s6503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy Hans, Dominique Robert

Abstract

This paper reviews the current clinical data for the role of transdermal buprenorphine (BUP TDS) in the treatment of diverse acute and chronic pain syndromes. Literature searches were carried out using PubMed (1988 to June 2009). The published findings seem to support hypotheses regarding the rather unique analgesic mechanisms of buprenorphine as compared with pure μ-opioids like morphine and fentanyl. However, the exact mechanism of this analgesic efficacy still remains largely unknown despite recent advances in preclinical pharmacological studies. Such assessments have demonstrated the sustained antihyperalgesic effect of buprenorphine in diverse animal pain models. These findings are supported in a growing number of clinical studies of oral, intrathecal, intravenous, and Bup TDS. This review paper focuses almost entirely on the clinical experience concerning the transdermal administration of buprenorphine, although preclinical aspects are also addressed in order to provide a complete picture of the unique pharmacological properties of this analgesic drug. Mounting evidence indicates the appropriateness of Bup TDS in the treatment of diverse acute and chronic pain syndromes which have been less or not responsive to other opioids. Additionally, BUP TDS seems to hold great promise for other difficult-to-treat (pain) conditions, such as patients in the intensive care setting. However, its use is somewhat tempered by the occurrence of local skin reactions which have been shown to be often therapy resistant. Further studies are certainly warranted to identify even more precisely the clinical syndromes that are most sensitive to buprenorphine treatment, and to compare buprenorphine to other opioids in head-to-head trials of acute and chronic pain conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,408,565
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#913
of 1,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,752
of 91,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.