↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bronchial thermoplasty: implementing best practice in the era of cost containment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Bronchial thermoplasty: implementing best practice in the era of cost containment
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s135291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laren D Tan, Nicholas Kenyon, Ken Y Yoneda, Samuel Louie

Abstract

Increasing dependence on advanced technologies in the 21st century has created a dilemma between the practice and business of medicine. From information technology to robotic surgery, new technologies have expanded treatment possibilities and have potentially improved patient outcomes and safety. Simultaneously, their escalating costs limit access for certain patients and health care facilities. Nevertheless, medical decisions should not simply be based on cost. Input from physicians and other health care specialists as well as adherence to best practice position statements, are vital to implementing truly cost-effective strategies in medicine. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT), a US Food and Drug Administration approved bronchoscopy procedure in difficult-to-control persistent asthma, is a prime example of a new technology facing cost and implementation challenges. We discuss the specific indications and contraindications for BT and review recent real-world experiences that can provide the foundation for building a comprehensive asthma program that provides BT for difficult-to-control asthma patients who fail national guideline treatment recommendations after an adequate clinical trial of one. We also offer insight into the barriers to implementing a successful BT program and strategies for overcoming them.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,910,703
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#360
of 460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,300
of 314,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.