| Title |
Comparative outcomes of peripheral nerve blocks versus general anesthesia for hip fractures in geriatric Chinese patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s61903 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Le Liu, Xiao Lin Wang, Mao Wei Gong, Hai Xing Mai, Shu Jun Pei, Wei Xiu Yuan, Hong Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,812,564
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#549
of 1,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,019
of 242,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.