↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effect of astaxanthin on cutaneous wound healing

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Effect of astaxanthin on cutaneous wound healing
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s142795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jitlada Meephansan, Atiya Rungjang, Werayut Yingmema, Raksawan Deenonpoe, Saranyoo Ponnikorn

Abstract

Wound healing consists of a complex series of convoluted processes which involve renewal of the skin after injury. ROS are involved in all phases of wound healing. A balance between oxidative and antioxidative forces is necessary for a favorable healing outcome. Astaxanthin, a member of the xanthophyll group, is considered a powerful antioxidant. In this study, we investigated the effect of topical astaxanthin on cutaneous wound healing. Full-thickness dermal wounds were created in 36 healthy female mice, which were divided into a control group and a group receiving 78.9 µM topical astaxanthin treatment twice daily for 15 days. Astaxanthin-treated wounds showed noticeable contraction by day 3 of treatment and complete wound closure by day 9, whereas the wounds of control mice revealed only partial epithelialization and still carried scabs. Wound healing biological markers including Col1A1 and bFGF were significantly increased in the astaxanthin-treated group since day 1. Interestingly, the oxidative stress marker iNOS showed a significantly lower expression in the study. The results indicate that astaxanthin is an effective compound for accelerating wound healing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 41 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 42 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,188,597
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#377
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,657
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.