Aneuploidogenic effects and DNA oxidation induced in vitro by differently sized gold nanoparticles
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2014
Sebastiano Di Bucchianico, Maria Rita Fabbrizi, Silvia Cirillo, Chiara Uboldi, Douglas Gilliland, Eugenia Valsami-Jones, Lucia Migliore
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||11||23%|
|Student > Master||7||15%|
|Student > Bachelor||7||15%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||4||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||12||25%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||10||21%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||8%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2014.
All research outputs
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 3,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 227,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.