↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
Title
Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2014
DOI 10.2147/cia.s56435
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ya-Huei Wu, Jérémy Wrobel, Mélanie Cornuet, Hélène Kerhervé, Souad Damnée, Anne-Sophie Rigaud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 325 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 16%
Researcher 45 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 89 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 12%
Engineering 36 11%
Psychology 34 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Computer Science 24 7%
Other 73 22%
Unknown 104 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,255
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,157
of 242,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#31
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.