↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Review of applications of microneedling in dermatology

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
10 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Review of applications of microneedling in dermatology
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2017
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s142450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Iriarte, Olabola Awosika, Monica Rengifo-Pardo, Alison Ehrlich

Abstract

Microneedling (MN) is a novel therapeutic modality in dermatology. Through physical trauma from needle penetration, MN induces a wound healing cascade with minimal damage to the epidermis. This allows for enhancement in the absorption of mainstay topical therapies across the thick stratum corneum. MN has become increasingly utilized over the last several years as it is a relatively simple procedure that is cost-effective, well tolerated, and offers both cosmetic and therapeutic benefits. The ability to treat localized areas of disease has led to numerous studies gauging its potential in focal diseases of inflammation, dyschromia, and photodamage. This review discusses the principles and evidence behind the expanding applications of MN. It has shown promising results as an adjuvant therapy for enhanced drug delivery in the treatment of atrophic scars, alopecia, actinic keratoses, and disorders of pigmentation such as melasma. The efficacy in treatment of vitiligo remains limited. Overall, the procedure has few adverse sequelae compared to other therapies, is highly efficacious, and is a viable resurfacing option for skin of color. Future research is needed to determine the frequency, interval, and specific device settings that foster optimal results. Additionally, large controlled trials are needed to shed light on the utility of MN as an evidence-based regimen for the treatment of various dermatologic conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Postgraduate 27 11%
Student > Master 23 10%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 77 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 82 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#579,275
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#62
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,180
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.