↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: current insights

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 672)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: current insights
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s120817
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah W Kinsinger

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) condition associated with significant health care utilization and quality-of-life impairment. Latest research indicates that the brain-gut axis plays a key role in the disorder, and the presence of psychological factors and central processing deficits contribute to symptom severity and disability. Psychological therapies as a whole have demonstrated good efficacy in reducing the severity of IBS symptoms. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has been tested most rigorously in multiple randomized controlled trials and consistently demonstrates significant and durable effects on IBS symptoms and quality of life. Various protocols for treating IBS have been developed, and most recent advances in the field include exposure-based treatments to target symptom-specific anxiety as well as modified delivery methods, including internet-based treatment models. Despite the well-documented advantages of CBT for IBS, it has been poorly disseminated and few patients have access to this treatment. The primary barrier to dissemination is the limited number of therapists with adequate training in GI psychology to provide this evidence-based intervention. Future developments in the field need to focus on training opportunities to equip more therapists to competently provide CBT for this population. Further efforts to develop telemedicine platforms for delivering this intervention will also improve accessibility for patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 197 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 18%
Student > Master 29 15%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 63 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 65 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#162,572
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#8
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,597
of 317,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.