| Title |
Evaluation of a minimally invasive procedure for sacroiliac joint fusion – an in vitro biomechanical analysis of initial and cycled properties
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/mder.s63499 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek P Lindsey, Luis Perez-Orribo, Nestor Rodriguez-Martinez, Phillip M Reyes, Anna Newcomb, Alexandria Cable, Grace Hickam, Scott A Yerby, Neil R Crawford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
| Engineering | 8 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#235
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,529
of 242,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.