↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Maintenance of the paraspinal muscles may protect against radiographic knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Maintenance of the paraspinal muscles may protect against radiographic knee osteoarthritis
Published in
Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , August 2017
DOI 10.2147/oarrr.s130688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koichiro Azuma, Yasushi Sera, Takuma Shinjo, Michiyo Takayama, Eisuke Shiomi, Suketaka Momoshima, Yasushi Iwao, Hiroyuki Ishida, Hideo Matsumoto

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is an increasing health problem worldwide. So far, only obesity and quadriceps weakness are identified as modifiable risk factors for knee OA. Core muscle strengthening is becoming increasingly popular among older adults because of its ability to enhance the activities of daily living during old age. This study investigated the associations of the size and quality of the abdominal trunk muscles with radiographic knee osteoarthritis (RKOA). From 2012 to 2016, data were collected from 146 males and 135 females (age 63.9±13.4 years, BMI 23.2±3.8 kg/m(2)) at annual musculoskeletal examinations, including knee radiographs and body composition analyses, by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Cross-sectional areas of abdominal trunk muscles were measured using a single-slice computed tomography scan image obtained at the level of the umbilicus. The prevalence of RKOA was 21.2% in males and 28.1% in females. Compared to subjects without RKOA, subjects with RKOA were ~6 years older and had smaller paraspinal muscle (38.4±8.7 vs 33.1±10.1 cm(2), p<0.01 in males; 24.1±7.1 vs 20.7±7.5 cm(2), p<0.05 in females). In contrast, there was no decrease in appendicular or total lean mass, and only in females, BMI and total fat mass (FM) were higher in subjects with RKOA (21.5±3.5 vs 24.5±4.4 kg/m(2), 16.7±7.0 vs 20.5±7.7 kg, respectively, both p<0.01). After adjusting for age and sex, smaller cross-sectional area/lower attenuation value of the paraspinal muscles was associated with RKOA (both p<0.05), while greater appendicular or total lean mass as well as greater FM was associated with RKOA. The size and quality of the paraspinal muscles were not associated with knee pain or habitual exercise. Small, poor-quality paraspinal muscles may be linked to a higher risk of RKOA, but appendicular or total lean mass was not a good predictor of RKOA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 20 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,975,214
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#67
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,069
of 328,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.